Pennanen
Antti Pennanen, Helsinki FI
Patent application number | Description | Published |
---|---|---|
20150356524 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EXECUTING FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS - A system for implementing at least one cryptocurrency transaction at a point-of-sale by using a mobile terminal is provided. The system is operable to provide authentication for implementing the one or more cryptocurrency transactions, wherein the system is operable to send at least one authentication request for the at least one cryptocurrency transaction from a payment terminal to a payment service hosted via one or more virtual computing machines, wherein the payment service is operable to provide a request for a PIN code at the mobile terminal; to send the PIN code from the mobile terminal via a secure channel to open a vault in the one or more virtual machines, wherein the vault contains one or more private keys which are useable for authenticating the at least one cryptocurrency transaction; and to confirm execution of the at least one cryptocurrency transaction to at least the payment terminal. | 12-10-2015 |
20150356555 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EXECUTING FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS - A system for implementing at least one cryptocurrency transaction at a point-of-sale by using a mobile terminal is provided. The system is operable to provide authentication for implementing the one or more cryptocurrency transactions, wherein the system is operable to send at least one authentication request for the at least one cryptocurrency transaction from a payment terminal to a payment service hosted via one or more virtual computing machines, wherein the payment service is operable to provide a request for a PIN code at the mobile terminal; to send the PIN code from the mobile terminal via a secure channel to open a vault in the one or more virtual machines, wherein the vault contains one or more private keys (PKI) which are useable for authenticating the at least one cryptocurrency transaction; and to confirm execution of the at least one cryptocurrency transaction to at least the payment terminal. | 12-10-2015 |
Juha T. Pennanen, Oulu FI
Patent application number | Description | Published |
---|---|---|
20150188432 | SWITCHED MODE ASSISTED LINEAR REGULATOR WITH SEAMLESS TRANSITION BETWEEN POWER TRACKING CONFIGURATIONS - A Switch Node Assisted Linear architecture, including a linear amplifier in parallel with a switched converter, is configurable in two tracking modes: (a) a SMAL regulator in which the amplifier sets toad voltage with an envelope tracking bandwidth, and the switched converter is configured for current assist, and (b) a Switched Mode Power Supply configuration in which the amplifier is switch-decoupled, and the switcher circuit is switched configured with an output capacitor, operable as an SMPS providing load voltage with an adaptive tracking bandwidth that is less than the envelope tracking bandwidth. Staged switching effects substantially seamless transitions between tracking modes, with the amplifier holding the load voltage at a substantially constant envelope tracking voltage (CVET): (a) for ET-AT transitions, the CVET mode enables pre-charging the output capacitor to a target AT voltage, prior to switch-decoupling the amplifier; and (b) for AT-ET transitions, CVET mode enables discharging the output capacitor. | 07-02-2015 |
Jukka Pennanen, Tampere FI
Patent application number | Description | Published |
---|---|---|
20160070257 | OPTIMIZATION OF A PROCESS - A controller of a process includes a resource consumption optimizer which receives sets of control actions for a plurality of actuators from an advanced process controller performing independent data processing with respect to the resource consumption optimizer, each set of control actions resulting in a set-specific combined control action effect. The resource consumption optimizer optimizes resource consumption associated with the sets of control actions by modifying at least one control action on the basis of resource consumption associated with the actuator performing the control action while keeping a difference between a combined control action effect of a modified control action set and a combined control action effect a received control action set set-specifically within an accepted range. | 03-10-2016 |